Pukinskis Set For Google Maps

P1 – People do not like to change.

P2 – Google Maps is functionally more efficient than Mapquest.

R1 – Interviews concerning use and preferences largely between Google Maps and Mapquest.

R2 – We each went in and surfed around Google Maps to get a better feel for what was and was not there for ourselves.

I1 – People stick to what they know even when it is more cluttered because it is easier to use as they have already taken the time and effort to learn it.

I2 – Google Maps is a very blank interface, very easy to use yet people are not drawn to it.

C1 – Google Maps could do with a simple overhaul that makes it initially very similar to Mapquest.  This is outright copying their style.  However, it is a stepping stone as most things that the people tend to latch onto are not drastically different and even alien to them but small stepping stones away from what they know and this allows a portal into a better interactive map.

C2 – Of course it would be viewed poorly but Google should just buy out Mapquest and be done with them when you consider P1 alone.

C3 – There is very little on the home page of Google Maps but the most obvious is a search.  This should be moved further and an entry for an address should be made more than obvious instead.  Even though simply putting in an address there works fine people shy away from it or might be intially confused.

Advertisements

One Response to “Pukinskis Set For Google Maps”

  1. Pukinskis Set « Human-Computer Interaction @ IU Says:

    […] Pukinskis Set November 17, 2008 — jaestes Pukinskis Set […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: